jobs autos homes

MARKETPLACE

Local BusinessesAds/ClassifiedsCoupons
AdvertiseCustomer ServicePost a Job

Thu, Sep 02 2010 | Welcome Guest | Login | Register

Uniontown, PA  Sunny, and 90 ° F

5 Day Forecast

Feds downplay risk of leak when well cap moved
September 01, 2010 12:50 PM
TEXT SIZE Increase text size Decrease text size
The Associated Press

Print Print  Email This E-mail this

The federal government's point man on the Gulf of Mexico spill response said Wednesday there is no "significant risk" that more oil will leak into the sea when engineers remove the temporary cap Thursday that first contained the gusher in mid-July.

Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said vessels will remain on standby just in case to collect any leaking oil.

"We do believe the risks are small for any hydrocarbon release," Allen said during a teleconference he held from BP's U.S. offices in Houston, where he met with BP engineers and senior leaders.

But he warned that with the cap and blowout preventer removed, engineers will be relying on the strength of the plug created when cement was pumped in from the top of the well.

"The goal there will be to secure the annulus as quick as we can," Allen said.

Allen said a break in the weather was expected in the Thursday-Friday timeframe, allowing engineers to proceed with the removal of the cap and then the raising of the blowout preventer, which failed to stop the oil from leaking in the first place.

That means the blowout preventer could begin being raised late Thursday or early Friday, but Allen cautioned that timeline could be stretched again if high seas continue to kick up.

After the failed blowout preventer has been removed and replaced with another one, engineers will then proceed with the final plugging of the blown-out well from the bottom using a relief well that has been drilled beside the well that blew out.

Advertisement

Government investigators are waiting to take possession of the failed blowout preventer, which is a key piece of evidence in ongoing probes of the disaster.

Allen said Wednesday that engineers don't currently know the exact condition of the 50-foot, 300-ton device.

"We will not know the exact status until they get that thing ashore and look inside," Allen said.

The Deepwater Horizon explosion April 20 killed 11 workers and led to 206 million gallons of oil spewing from BP's undersea well.

Meanwhile, BP PLC said it has spent more than $5 million a week on advertising since the Gulf oil spill began _ more than three times the amount it spent on ads during the same period last year.

BP told the House Energy and Commerce Committee that it spent a total of $93 million on advertising from April to the end of July. The company says the money was intended to keep Gulf Coast residents informed on issues related to the oil spill and to ensure transparency about its actions. The increased spending was largely targeted at TV, newspapers and magazines. A small portion was directed to the Internet.

BP said it actually aired fewer TV spots from April to July than during a similar period last year.

  

Comments

Comments

snooky5001, 11-15-09 9:07 pm |  Rate: 0  | 
sounds to me that the 2 of you are just jealous, not realizing how much time and effort it takes to bag this buck !!!!!

cali, 11-15-09 9:58 pm |  Rate: 0  | 
Well at least he wont be hungry this winter. and thats what it is all about. bringin home the grubb.

BER87, 11-16-09 2:43 am |  Rate: 0  | 
I love comments like the one above. While I agree that the picture is questionable, I certainly believe that killing an animal does not make a person a monster. Especially since that hamburger or chicken sandwich you most certainly have eaten in the past was made available to you by means ranging from electrocution, being shot, beheaded, or having a bolt driven through the skull and into the animal's brain. The difference is the fact that the animals we pluck parts from at the grocery store don't have a chance, their fate is pre-determined. In hunting, the animal does have a chance. Especially in this case as in order to have a buck entered into the Pope and Young record book, the deer has to be killed with a bow. That is much harder than herding it into the slaughter house and driving something into its skull, electrocuting it, or shooting it with a bullet.

By the way, if you want to preserve life, some of it has to be taken, especially since we humans have mostly destroyed the natural predators that once kept the ecosystem in check. Deer #'s would range in the millions, many would starve to death, and whole herds would be overcome by disease due to over-population if we simply took the "My Little Pony" approach of kill nothing when approaching nature. Or, we could restore the natural balance and return Cougar and Wolves back into our local environment to keep the animals in check for us. Look out the next time you let fluffy out to use the potty. I also love the fact that most of the time, people who make comments like this would mash a tiny little spider while screaming bloody murder, and most likely have either rarely or never set foot into the natural environment that they claim to be such experts on and preserve so well. They don't know anything beyond what their internet connection, cell phone, or text book tells them. Oh, one simple fact to point out, if real men didn't destroy some life, the human race would have been nothing more than a memory by now.

So, while the photo could have been better, killing animals is a simple and essential part of a natural ecosystem. The only difference in hunting and eating a burger is the fact that you just paid someone to take care of the messy part for you. You just paid someone to pluck an animal from a pen and slaughter it. Something still had to die in order for that quarter pound treat to be on your plate. And while you aren't being kind to one animal while harvesting it, you are being kind to the environment and ecosystem which that animal is a part of. That is the bigger picture, the one that matters most. While I strongly disagree with people who kill just to watch something die, kill endangered species, poach, or kill for black market profit, I have absolutely no problem with a hunter taking an animal respectfully and fairly. And, even if they don't know it, they are contributing to the natural cycle of life in which the "real world" depends.

Good Day

alpha5, 11-16-09 8:40 am |  Rate: 0  | 
BER87 --- I couldn't have said it better. I've had this same discussion with many over the years. I am a hunter, have killed and understand the purpose. I have seen the results of over population in the herds and it is not nice.

LisaLisa, 11-16-09 10:49 am |  Rate: 0  | 
congrats Ryan ! Alpha 1 has it on target ! .... Hunting is an American tradition ! and puts food onthe table ! ...

walteq, 11-16-09 11:08 am |  Rate: 0  | 
When you have to use cameras to hunt its sad and time to quit hunting. Don't call yourself a hunter when you have to hunt like that. Real hunters don't stalk thier prey. Are you that hungry for publicity?

ohio snowbird, 11-16-09 11:54 am |  Rate: 0  | 
The tree huggers can't stand to see hunting. What does a tree taste like! Get a life people. This guy did you a favor, you could have hit it with your car and then tell us how you you feel about it. Thanks Ryan, thats one deer that won't be causing $2500 damage to my car. Been there !!

1

Add a comment