Grain-free diet saves lives
DEAR DR. FOX: I sent my original email to you on Nov. 7, 2013, and I want to share the benefits of your good advice about changing my dog’s diet.
My female Lab mix has been on Authority Grain-Free Dry Dog Food for 10 to 11 weeks. In this time, she has not had a single bout of diarrhea or loose stool, and her anal glands have not leaked constantly like they were doing. She was at the groomer’s one time in this time period, and the groomer said her anal glands were pretty full and emptied them. I went back and checked all the ingredients in the dry dog foods I tried before — Science Diet Adult, Purina One Smart Blend, Authority and Science Diet ID — and the one common ingredient found in all those foods was CORN.
Additionally, all of those foods had some form of soy (meal, flakes or oil) except Authority. Therefore, I’m thinking she has sensitivity to corn. Feeding her the grain-free food has resolved the problem. She had few symptoms of an allergy: She never vomited and she did not have dark stools or other symptoms, except the repetitive bouts of diarrhea and stinky breath. Could the corn have been “fermenting” in her gut, causing all these problems, including the stinky breath?
I’m writing this so you can let others know that their dogs may very well have this sort of sensitivity to dry dog foods with corn and that trying a grain-free food might help.
Would you please give your thoughts on this matter and whether you think this may have been causing the regular, repetitive bouts of diarrhea and stinky breath for my girl? Thank you for a great column and your assistance and continual advice. — T.D., St. Louis
DEAR T.D.: Corn and soybean farmers get huge subsidies that benefit the livestock feed industry as well as the human food and beverage industries. These are cheap ingredients that the pet food industry has used for decades. At first, according to informed opinion I drew from letters received from dog owners, these ingredients were not a significant problem for most dogs.
But, as I have documented in my writings about GMOs — genetically modified corn and soy — these are also widely used by the human food industry. The more that GMO corn and soy were being grown and used in pet foods, the more digestive, skin and other health problems were reported to me by concerned pet owners. The proverbial penny dropped when many of their animals recovered to full health when corn and soy were removed from their diets.
The companies selling GMO seeds deny that there are any health or environmental concerns and falsely claim that this is the most efficient way to produce affordable food and feed a hungry world. Their denial is palpable. They have spent millions of dollars to defeat civil society initiatives in California and Washington state to label all products that contain GMO ingredients.
Many readers will appreciate your success with changing your dog’s diet and see the GMO issue as a red flag for their own health as well as for their animal companions.
Some imported rice is GMO, as are products from canola, sugar beet, cotton and alfalfa. Soon, if this biotech industry has its way, wheat may become GMO. Informed consumers must stop this insanity in the marketplace.
PET FOOD SAFETY CONCERNS
According to reporter Kim Campbell Thornton, writing in the Philadelphia Inquirer, there were 33 pet food recalls in 2013. The Food and Drug Administration received more than 2,500 consumer complaints regarding pet food and livestock feed from 2008 to 2012. Contamination with pathogens such as salmonella, physical contaminants including plastic and glass and issues with improper levels of nutrient supplements were among the top pet food problems in 2013.
In order to rectify these problems, the FDA is proposing that pet food manufacturers be required to lay out food safety plans, including record-keeping provisions and protocols for responding to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses, as well as having to instigate effective controls for probable hazards and establish and maintain standards of cleanliness. Inspectors would have more power to act before contaminated products reach store shelves and to restrict imports from suppliers who don’t meet the new standards.