In double bid to world opinion, Iraq files arms declaration
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) _ Iraq handed over its long-awaited arms declaration to the United Nations on Saturday, denying it has doomsday weapons, and President Saddam Hussein grudgingly apologized to Kuwait for his 1990 invasion. It was a dramatic double bid by the Baghdad leadership to end a nightmare decade for the nation.
“We apologize to you,” Saddam said in a letter to the Kuwaiti people read on prime-time Iraqi television. At the same time, at a U.N. compound on Baghdad’s outskirts, a government delegation was delivering a massive collection of documents detailing Iraq’s chemical, biological and nuclear programs, meeting a demand and a deadline set by U.N. resolution 1441.
The declaration will “answer all the questions,” said Lt. Gen. Hossam Mohammed Amin, its chief author. If the United States “has the minimum level of fairness and braveness,” it will accept it as the truth, he said.
Its thousands of pages, to be flown Sunday to U.N. headquarters in New York and the U.N. nuclear agency in Vienna, will be combed through for months to come by U.N. analysts, intelligence agencies and diplomats, as Middle East peace hangs in the balance.
The dramatic events of a Saturday evening in Baghdad were a watershed moment in a chain of war and sanctions set off by the Iraqi army’s invasion and seven-month occupation of Kuwait, which ended only when a huge, U.S.-led force drove it out in February 1991.
If Iraq is eventually found to have cooperated fully with the U.N. effort to deny it chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, the U.N. Security Council would consider lifting the crippling economic sanctions Iraqis have lived under for 12 years.
But new teams of U.N. arms inspectors are now crisscrossing Iraq in search of signs of weapons of mass destruction, and President Bush says it is sure Baghdad still has such weapons. It has threatened war to enforce Iraqi disarmament.
The huge Iraqi declaration, summarizing largely civilian industrial activity, was an anticlimax, since the Iraqi denial has been repeated endlessly, including by Gen. Amin on Saturday. “I reiterate here Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction,” he told reporters.
But the Saddam letter was unexpected, and obviously timed in tandem with the “tell-all” arms documents. It was the first time he had offered an apology for the bloody attack 12 years ago _ although it was an apology couched in bitterness.
“We apologize to God for any act that has angered the Almighty in the past and that was held against us, and we apologize to you (the Kuwaitis) on the same basis,” said Saddam’s letter, read by his information minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf.
But the Iraqi president also laid out the justifications for the invasion, from Baghdad’s point of view, involving what he considered anti-Iraqi oil policies of the Kuwaiti government.
Distinguishing between Kuwait’s people and their leaders, he assailed today’s Kuwaiti government, saying it is working “with foreigners” who have aggressive designs on Iraq, and he declared that Kuwait, where thousands of U.S. troops have been based since the 1991 war, is under American occupation.
Post-Gulf War resolutions of the Security Council mandate that Iraq make amends to Kuwait, including accounting for some 600 Kuwaitis still missing as a result of the occupation, and for large amounts of looted materials. Iraqi reparations payments are being made under U.N. auspices.
Those resolutions also required Iraq to give up its chemical and biological weapons, and shut down its program to try to build nuclear bombs.
From 1991 to 1998, U.N. inspectors destroyed many tons of such weapons and dismantled the nuclear effort. But when they left in 1998, amid U.N.-Iraqi disputes over access to sites and U.S. spies within the U.N. operation, they suspected they had not found all Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
The most recent resolution, adopted Nov. 8, required Iraq to file by Dec. 8 an “accurate, full, and complete declaration” of all such weapons programs. It was also required to report on “all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programs,” even if not weapon-related.
The second requirement led to a “huge declaration,” as Amin called it, one heavy with reports on “dual-use” industry _ civilian facilities whose equipment or products could be diverted to civilian use. Chlorine, for example, can be used to treat water, or to fabricate chemical weapons.
The result was at least a dozen bound volumes, including four devoted separately to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile activities, titled “Currently Accurate, Full and Complete Declarations.” The mass of paper, in red and blue covers, was accompanied by computer disks.
During the 50-minute private handover at the U.N. offices, the Iraqis and U.N. officials checked over three sets of documents _ one to go to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna; one to the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) in New York; and the third for the Security Council. The council’s documents, in a black tote bag, was carefully secured with a stamped, red-wax seal.
These massive reports on past weapons programs and industrial activity will take U.N. experts weeks to analyze and U.N. inspectors months to verify inside Iraq, to ensure production activities do not involve proscribed weapons.
Inspectors from UNMOVIC and IAEA returned to Iraq two weeks ago after a four-year interruption, and are making surprise visits to former Iraqi chemical, biological and nuclear weapons installations, and to dual-use industrial facilities.
After a two-day Muslim holiday break, they resumed their inspections Saturday, visiting two sites south of Baghdad previously inspected in the 1990s _ an industrial complex that in the 1980s helped make medium-range missiles now forbidden to Iraq by the United Nations, and a site associated with Iraq’s major nuclear research center.
The UNMOVIC investigators hope the Iraqi declaration will help them with unanswered questions by, for example, supplying convincing documentation on the fate of 550 artillery shells filled with poisonous mustard gas. Iraqi and U.N. accounts contain many such discrepancies from the 1990s.
The U.N. resolution provides that “false statements or omissions” in Iraq’s declaration would constitute a “material breach,” that is, a potential cause for military action, but only if coupled with Iraqi non-cooperation. That would seem to exempt inaccuracies shown to be inadvertent.