close

Government intervention to no avail

By Herald Standard Staff 4 min read

It’s absolutely nutty, you know, this business of giving cocaine to monkeys as part of a stimulus bill that hasn’t stimulated anything outside of cages, least of all job creation. But there’s something nuttier still. That’s the Obama administration’s justification of the project. Here’s the thing, we’re told – the $71,000 experiment, disparaged in a Republican report as one of 100 pieces of pork punishing employment seekers, could teach us something about human addiction. My goodness, just think of all the economic benefits that could flow from that.

Sorry, but the response misses the point of what a stimulus is about, helping you to understand why an important member of President Obama’s economic team is scooting from the scene. Though hardly an innocent herself, Christina Romer knows the stimulus was meant to have an immediate economic impact and surely gets it that scientific research is about long-term impacts that may or may not eventuate. Research for the future and stimulus for today’s needs are two vastly different things. Period. End of story.

Well, not really the end of the story, because Romer, who is supposed to be President Obama’s chief economic advisor, could once have told you that stimulus packages seldom if ever do any good even if nonpolitically assembled. Articles tell us she’s done research showing the New Deal fiscal spending did something like zip, zero, nada in ending the Depression and that recessions ordinarily wind up much more quickly if governments stay shy of such let’s-pretend remedies.

Sadly, she betrayed those insights in initially bragging about this stimulus package that cost as much as the war in Iraq. Did she finally come to her senses? We’re told by a National Journal reporter that she is quitting Sept. 3 because she was not getting as much presidential access as she wanted. My own guess is that hers was becoming a voice of caution that received insufficient attention.

Another departing official, Peter Orzag, who was director of the Office of Management and Budget, apparently intended from the start to leave after a couple of years of that job’s inevitable strain. He, too, was all for the stimulus. But he also insisted that you cannot ride the bucking bronco of deficits forever. He shuddered at increasing the current debt by $9 trillion more over the next 10 years, saying you’ve got to lasso this horse, calm him down, adopt strategies of restraint.

More specifically, he advised spending cuts, and what we got mostly from others on the Obama team was wink, wink, nudge, nudge, spend, spend, and continue to spend.

For Orzag, it was hi, ho and away we go, but others refuse to desert the sinking Obama ship, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who points to various positive signs in the economy. And yes, there are some. Sadly for all of us, the negative signs overwhelm them – the unemployment rate tells us of fellow citizens made miserable by this slow-poke recovery. A buoyant, Bush-blaming President Obama assures us his policies scared away a depression. Nope. Meet John Taylor.

An economics professor at Stanford who has conducted a study on the question, Taylor has observed that little that has been done on any federal front in the final Bush year and since then has accomplished much. Low Federal Reserve interest rates helped get the recession started. The stimulus was meant to jump-start consumption, but did no such thing. Improvements in business investment cannot be traced to the government. The worry about debt and other uncertainties about policies are now deterring growth.

Given what else we may still face from this administration, such as tax increases hurtful to small business owners, a strange, weird vision comes to mind, one in which coke-snorting monkeys note the openings on the economic team and manage to communicate advice to Washington that would be economically ruinous but keep them supplied with drugs. They find to their delight that it is gladly accepted as still more evidence the stimulus worked.

Jay Ambrose, formerly Washington director of editorial policy for Scripps Howard newspapers and the editor of dailies in El Paso, Texas, and Denver, is a columnist living in Colorado. He can be reached at SpeaktoJay@aol.com.

CUSTOMER LOGIN

If you have an account and are registered for online access, sign in with your email address and password below.

NEW CUSTOMERS/UNREGISTERED ACCOUNTS

Never been a subscriber and want to subscribe, click the Subscribe button below.

Starting at $4.79/week.

Subscribe Today