California passes ordinance assessing fees on university
CALIFORNIA — Officials from California University of Pennsylvania voiced objections Thursday to an ordinance regulating the sale of alcohol at the university’s Convocation Center.
The ordinance establishes the sale of alcohol as a conditional use in the institutional zone. It also sets the fee to be paid to the borough for each event at which alcohol is served, with the fee based on the number of people in attendance. The fee starts at $750 for an event with attendance of up to 1,499 people and goes up by $750 for each additional 1,500 in attendance. The top fee is $3,750 for a crowd of 6,000 or more.
Craig Butzine, the university’s vice president for marketing and university relations, voiced the university’s objections, saying the hearing was unnecessary and illegal.
“There is no need for the proposed ordinance because the Borough Code in its current state already permits liquor licensees like the university’s vendor to sell liquor in areas zoned institutional,” Butzine said. “Also, the proposed ordinance we are discussing tonight violates state law, because it openly tries to tax the university. The borough is aware that this tax would be illegal.”
The university had presented a proposal to the borough in which the university would compensate the borough for any additional expenses incurred directly related to events at the Convocation Center if a documented invoice were sent to the university.
The only other objections to the ordinance came from resident Jim Maddiex.
“I understand why they want to sell alcohol. It’s to raise money. As a former student, I don’t particularly think it’s right. It sets a bad precedent on campus,” Maddiex said.
Maddiex also questioned how the borough would verify the attendance figures at events in order to assess the proper fee. Maddiex also suggested that the ordinance include a ban on the university allowing functions at which attendees could bring their own alcoholic beverages.
Immediately following the hearing council held a special meeting, voting on the single issue of the ordinance, which passed unanimously and without discussion.



